Crum on Showbiz

By Steve Crum

Sam Mendes’ 1917 is arguably among THE best movies set during WWI ever produced. That exclusive list includes All Quiet on the Western Front (1929), La Grande Illusion (1937), 1960’s Paths of Glory, Wings (1927), and War Horse (2015). 1917’s plot involves a 24-hour life or death mission ordered to two British soldiers. As such, the film is so much more plotted than firing and dodging bullets. 

1917 is about humanity, fear, heroics, death, hope, and brotherhood. That last one is particularly apt in regard to the two soldiers who are 1917’s central characters.

Co-writer Sam Mendez (American Beauty, Skyfall), who also directs and produces, has fashioned a touching and dynamic tale of two British Lance Corporals given the near suicide assignment of delivering a message to British forces sequestered in in a humongous trench miles away. The two must cross enemy German lines (“No Man’s Land”) to save the lives of 1,600 British troops. Lance Corporals William Schofield (George MacKay) and Tom Blake (Dean-Charles Chapman) were particularly chosen since Blake’s older brother, a lieutenant, is among that battalion to be alerted. The message warns of stopping the planned attack on Germans since the Germans have faked their retreat only to lie in waiting for their own surprise attack. As their CO, General Erinmore (Colin Firth) informs them: “They’re walking into a trap. Your orders are to deliver a message calling off tomorrow mornings attack. If you fail, it will be a massacre.”

Incidentally, the planned recipient of the message, Col. Mackenzie, is portrayed by Benedict Cumberbatch. He and Firth are the only recognizable names in the cast…and they are in very small parts. However, relative unknown George MacKay should attain significant star status due to his terrific acting. It is essentially a solo, star spotlight for him. 

 Mendes based this nearly two hour war drama on stories told to him by his late grandfather, who served with the British Army in WWI. That said, his fictional 1917 work is both credible and incredible. What an adventure. 

Within the day’s journey, the two corporals encounter rotting corpses hanging on barbed wire, rats, corpses in ditches, booby traps, snipers, corpses in abandoned buildings, airplanes dogfighting, floating corpses, and the enemy—face to face. The kindness and sensitivity to fellow humans is also shown.

Specifics, as well as the memorable conclusion, will not be divulged here.

But mention must be made of Roger Deakins’ superb cinematography. His visuals are a wow. Who will forget those night scenes in the bombed out French village that appear surreal and nightmarish? The incredible long, long shots of walking and running through the lengthy trenches were accomplished via extended takes and sharp editing by Lee Smith. 

Thomas Newman’s moving score is also a plus. 

The realism of 1917 is accentuated by filming locations in Scotland and Great Britain. Harking back to the pre-digital effects days, some shots utilized as many as 500 background extras. 

Both 1917 and Mendes recently won Golden Globes as Best Picture and Director. Why stop here? The Oscars are just around the proverbial corner. 

=====

GRADE, On A to F Scale: A

By Steve Crum

For a Star Wars fan like myself (I still have the original 1977 program sold in the lobby), screening Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker was both a proverbial labor of love AND a duty. My fervent anticipation of a new Star Wars flick was still flickering. Per se. However, News Flash: This grand finale to the “Skywalker Saga” nine films is a must see, but a bit disappointing.

Credit J. J. Abrams, who co-wrote, co-produced and directed this episode as well as episode 7, The Force Awakens, in 2015. In his defense, it was a daunting task to tether all the plot lines and character elements into a cohesive conclusion. Think of all the characters from Luke Skywalker to Darth Vader to Palpatine to Kylo Ren and Rey. Then there are the robots, storm troopers, brothers and sisters (Luke and Leia), husbands and wives (Han and Leia), and various planet inhabitants. If it sounds like a bulk of beings to squeeze into 142 minutes, it is because it is. As a result, one has to look fast and wide to glimpse the many cameos and walk-ons. 

The end result is an obviously huge scale action-adventure tale with state of the art effects and sparse time for good natured joking and character development. Then again, why is character development necessary? In most of the movie, it isn’t needed. We already know these people, these creatures, these robots. However, major characterization change does occur with two of the principal characters: the last Jedi Ren (played by Daisy Ridley); and Kylo Ren (Adam Driver), the Supreme Leader of the First Order and son of Leia Organa (Carrie Fisher) and Han Solo (Harrison Ford). 

To summarize the overall plot, using studio publicity, The Rise of Skywalker takes place “a year after the events of The Last Jedi. The remnants of the Resistance face the First Order once again—while reckoning with the past and their own inner turmoil. Meanwhile, the ancient conflict between the Jedi and the Sith reaches its climax.”

It is good seeing Carrie Fisher return as Leia, albeit via clever editing and unused footage from The Force Awakens. (Fisher died in 2016.) And 82 year-old Billy Dee Williams has more than just a line or two in his return as Lando Calrissian, the original owner of the Millennium Falcon. 

Richard E. Grant, last year’s Best Supporting Actor Oscar winner for Can You Ever Forgive Me?, displays his evil chops as First Order General Pryde. The long list of Star Wars returnees  includes Mark Hamill (Luke Skywalker), Oscar Isaac (Poe Dameron), Anthony Daniels (C-3PO), Lupita Nyong’o (Maz Kanata), Ian McDiarmid (Palpatine/Darth Sidious), John Boyega (Finn), and Joonas Suotamo (Chewbacca).

Spoiler Alert: There are some surprise characters returning as well as some surprise deaths. That’s all I will reveal….except to look for a sea of quicksand. 

Oh yes, let us not overlook composer-conductor John Williams. The brilliant 87 year-old came out of retirement to score yet another Star Wars movie. 

Star Wars: The Rise of Skywalker lacks the outright fun and originality of the previous episodes, but it achieves its goal of providing big scale closure.

=====

GRADE, On A to F Scale: B

By Steve Crum

Whether or not one is a fan of either cars or car racing has little bearing on enjoying the factually based Ford v Ferrari. It is arguably the best movie about auto racing ever produced. FvF is that good, that compelling. (And I am neither a car nor car racing devotee.) 

Pistons and torques aside, FvF is really about friendship, love, trust, and risk. It is a balancing act superbly orchestrated by director James Mangold (Cop Land; Logan), and his screen scribes Jez Butterworth, John-Henry Butterworth, and Jason Keller.

Heading a pretty stellar cast are Matt Damon and Christian Bale. The actors are solid and the car racing sequences should garner Oscar noms for cinematography (Phedon Papamichael) and editing (Michael McCusker, Andrew Buckland). 

The story, set in 1963-66, focuses on car racing legends Carroll Shelby (Damon) and Ken Miles (Bale), who soon team to design and build a race car (for the Ford Motor Co.) that will surpass any offered by the seemingly unbeatable Italian Ferrari. This ultimately leads to the history making 1966 make-or-break (or brake) challenge at the grueling 24-hour Le Mans race in France. Specifically, it was the just developed Ford GT40 that faced Ferrari’s best. (No spoiler here about who wins.) 

The tender heart of FvF involves the human relationships between Shelby and Miles; Miles and his wife Mollie (played by Caitriona Balfe); and son Peter (Noah Jupe). Jupe, by the way, is terrific. 

All this contrasts with some really dictatorial corporation heads, Henry Ford II (Tracy Letts) and Enzo Ferrari (Remo Girone). It is their rivalry that leads to the ultimate showdown in France. 

In fine support are Josh Lucas as Leo Beebe, a Ford exec, and Jon Bernthal’s Lee Iacocca, VP of Ford. Worthy of mention is Marco Beltrami’s racing score, which keeps one on edge with a modified heartbeat—seemingly pacing the track. 

As a casual driver who dislikes driving at night, the scenes of cars barreling along at 200+ mph during the grueling Le Mans in near pitch black, overnight conditions hit me like a shock horror flick. Make that Fear v Ferrari.   

=====

GRADE, On A to F Scale: A

By Steve Crum

The central character in the biographical Harriet is Araminta “Minty” Ross (1822-1913), far better known then and today as Harriet Tubman. She is extraordinary, this movie far less so. And that is a shame, since Tubman’s exploits deserve more than just a mostly dry telling. For example, the 125 minutes certainly adhere to the facts of her enslavement since birth in Maryland, followed by her escape north to safety in Philadelphia, and then repeatedly returning (13 times) to her Maryland roots to free relatives and friends. 

However, it is unfortunate that director/co-screenwriter Kasi Lemmons (Talk to Me) fails to give Harriet and her story anything more than a one-dimensional treatment. The film looks and feels more like a well done History Channel reenactment. The facts are solid, but the emotional impact is lacking.

The story itself (co-written by Lemmons and Gregory Allen Howard—based on his story) focuses on Harriet (Cynthia Erivo) when she is in her early 20s, and living as a slave on a plantation in Dorchester County, Maryland. She falls in love with and marries John Tubman (Zackary Momoh), who is enslaved at the same location. When the stern “master” plans to sell her to another slave owner, she immediately makes plans to escape, and then travel north via an “underground railroad” to the free state of Pennsylvania. Through drive and good luck, Harriet eludes her owner’s tracking dogs and posse. 

Noteworthy is the fact that Harriet’s faith in God is demonstrated throughout her escape. Even with bloodhounds baying in the near distance, Harriet would often drop to her knees in the forrest, and engage in prayer—asking for guidance in deciding which way to run for safety. The film portrays this as trance-like behavior. God would tell her to either go right or left, according to the movie. 

This is a good time to interject that when Tubman was a child, she suffered a severe head injury when an overseer threw a heavy weight at another slave, hitting her instead. Harriet later said, “It broke my skull.” Historical accounts report that Tubman had painful headaches and seizures the rest of her life. 

All this might be due to her bouts of dropping to pray at various stressful times in her life, occurrences that Tubman attributed to hearing God’s call. Incidentally, the film references her injury (though not in detail), and infers it affected her anti-slavery actions for the rest of her life. This is because Tubman herself thought her head pains guided her on the righteous path to free slaves by God.  

Once with anti-slavers in Philadelphia, Tubman is aided by William Still (Leslie Odom Jr.), an abolitionist/writer. He is so inspirational that Harriet decides to return to her Southern homestead to rescue her husband and bring him back to Philly. He has remarried, thinking Harriet was surely dead. Then he refuses to go with her. Harriet finds others to rescue (like her parents and siblings), a trek repeated over a dozen times. 

Note: The movie indicates that Harriet changed her first name from Araminta after meeting Still. In fact, she changed it to Harriet soon after marrying John. It is no big historical deal, really. Just chalk it up to poetic license. 

In Philadelphia, Harriet befriends Marie Buchanon (Janelle Monáe), a boarding house proprietor. 

Harriet’s ongoing rescues ratchet up the intensity to capture her. Her former owner, Gideon Brodess (Joe Alwyn) employs professional slave catchers to tighten the search. It soon becomes a deadly match between Tubman and Brodess, which occupies about 3/4 of the film’s running time. It was during this period that Harriet was appropriately nicknamed “Moses.” 

There is a brief narrated scene toward the finale which depicts “Moses” leading an armed assault during the Civil War, in which 750 slaves were rescued. Yes, Harriet always carried a loaded pistol, and used it when necessary. Omitted from the screenplay is Tubman’s memorable anti-slavery work with abolitionist John Brown. (That would have made a movie unto itself.) 

There were many other valiant episodes in Harriet Tubman’s life unmentioned in Harriet, but it would take a mini-series or 5-hour movie to cover it all. That said, the Harriet Tubman story would have fared better as a Ken Burns documentary than as a Kasi Lemmons fictional biography. 

Then again, with the former we would be missing some fine work by Cynthia Erivo. 

=====

GRADE, On A to F Scale: C+

By Steve Crum

First things first, ladies and gentlemen. Of course, Renée Zellweger does not sing as well as Judy Garland. But wow, Zellweger does the great Garland proud! In Judy, Zellweger captures Judy Garland’s persona and—surprisingly—her voice and performance demeanor. She is enough like Judy to convince this longtime Garland fan. 

Believe me, I dreaded seeing this movie ever since I heard it was being made. And with Renée Zellweger as Judy Garland, God forbid. Not to worry. All is very OK, even though Garland’s daughter, Liza Minnelli, reportedly does not endorse it. (She is briefly portrayed in it, however, by Gemma-Leah Devereux.) Director Rupert Goold, predominantly a director of British stage dramas, handles this film quite well.

For the most part, movie biographies are anti-climactic. The life of the person depicted is usually public knowledge. Judy is no exception, so it is unsurprising full of pathos and tragedy. It should be no spoiler that Garland’s life ended at age 47 on June 22, 1969 in London, where she was performing a five-week run of concerts. Shortly before, she married her fifth husband, promoter/lounge singer Mickey Deans (Finn Wittrock). It is depicted in the movie. 

Although Judy focuses on her final weeks, there are numerous flashbacks to her MGM days, beginning with the most famous Garland movie of them all, The Wizard of Oz. Darci Shaw plays the young Judy, as she is confronted on the set by MGM’s studio head, Louis B. Mayer (Richard Cordery). His “fatherly” private conversations with her are depicted throughout Judy, each time getting more despotic and terrifying. Mayer is shown to be an absolute thug spewing out threats and insults designed for Judy’s pushing herself way past any human’s limit, let alone a child’s. It is child abuse to the max, including his orders forcing her to take drugs to keep her awake and drugs to make her sleep. As shown in the film, those bad habits and resulting instabilities were still Judy’s inner demons by 1969. 

Later in life, Judy loses custody of her younger kids to ex-husband Sid Luft (Rufus Sewell) because of lack of income and home—taken by taxes and poor management. Her London engagement was hoped to be a positive turning point. 

So the movie Judy goes, accentuated by Zellweger’s realistic take on Garland’s mood swings, drinking, and drugging. It was peaks and valleys on stage and off. 

Noteworthy is the fine work of Jessie Buckley as Judy’s exasperated yet sensitive personal assistant while in London.

Of the half dozen Garland songs sung by Zellweger, her performance of Come Rain or Come Shine is pretty fantastic, a real salute to Judy. 

Zellweger, who undoubtedly will be Oscar nominated for her stellar work, has the advantage of falling short of Judy Garland’s 1940s-‘50s voice quality…but pretty much equaling the final days of the diva’s voice in the late 1960s. By then, Garland’s sound was rough edged, the vibrato weaker. Singing and those familiar Zellweger mouth puckers aside, Renée’s acting is terrific. 

Regarding Tom Edge’s screenplay (based on Peter Quilter’s book, End of the Rainbow), the film falls way short of displaying the witty Judy Garland’s sharp sense of humor.

If nothing else, seeing Judy will trigger Garland fans to get out the old CDs and revisit those Capitol and Decca recordings…like her 1961 Carnegie Hall concert, for starters. 

=====

GRADE, On A to F Scale: A-