IT’S CRUMMY TRIVIA TIME…with JOHN BARRYMORE!
July 21, 2009
By Steve Crum
JOHN BARRYMORE [1882-1942], the renowned silent and sound screen star and grandfather of Drew Barrymore, has a distinction other than his publicized alcoholism. No, it’s not that he was one of the three Royal Family Barrymores of theater and film, Lionel and Ethel being the others. Yes, he was one of W. C. Fields’ drinking buddies, but that is generally known too. Barrymore, whose Hollywood publicity promoted him as The Great Profile–based on his sculpted facial features, holds a movie star record yet to be broken.
Kissing.
In Don Juan (Warner Brothers, 1926), the first American feature film with sound, Barrymore lip locked a combined 127 times with co-stars Mary Astor and Estelle Taylor. However, you cannot hear either the love smacks or any dialogue since only music and more spectacular sound effects like sword fighting are included on the soundtrack.A swig of Listerine, please.
——————–
For a lip smacking taste of a dozen or so Barrymore kisses, go here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Xwwuy2rsgFc
Emmy, meeny, miny, and even more
July 18, 2009
By Steve Crum
I’ve said it before: 10 percent of TV’s best programming is higher caliber quality than 90 percent of motion picture (big screen) product. I am talking any comparable, given year for each medium.
Of course, that means there is also 90 percent of television programming–mainly non-drama–that is below par, either leaning toward mediocre or bottoming out. For a positive example, nearly any episode of CSI is better produced, acted, written, and directed than most dramas opening at movie houses. I say most. Now and then, Hollywood movie studios do get it right.
This year’s Emmy nominations focus on the elite top tenth of TV broadcasting. Dramas, comedies, and mini-series are comfortable fits here. That the reality show phenomenon must be represented is regrettable, but not to the millions who thrive on peeking at real competitive humans displaying extreme stress, anger, and joy. Sometimes it is akin to stopping to leer at a car wreck. In high school, where I taught over three decades, it is comparable to the enthusiastic crowd that formed every time a fight broke out in the hall. Exclude me from this mass entertainment. Their wild popularity is reflected by 22 *gasp* reality shows receiving 63 nominations. Ratings dictate. That is truly reality.
——————–
There are some surprises this year, led by Tina Fey and her 30 Rock ensemble garnering 22 nominations. That is the highest number for any comedy series in Emmy history. Remember too that in the days of I Love Lucy and The Andy Griffith Show, there were fewer categories. Still, it is a great achievement. Fey is the Elaine May of our time, a powerhouse comedienne, actress, writer and producer.——————–
With 16 nominations, Mad Men continues to baffle the masses. The fact is few have ever seen the series, which kicks off its third season on AMC next month. From the beginning it received critical raves. Its comparably small audience, I among, are loyal fans. Its production values, including acting, set design, directing and even quirky theme music, are top flight.
Mad Men is all about the lives of advertising guys and gals set in an ad agency during the late 1950s through the ‘60s. Great writing too. If you have never seen it, catch it from the beginning since it is episodic. Then, as they used to say in New York’s Madison Avenue parlance, “Run it up a flag pole, and see if you salute.” By the way, the “Mad” in the title refers to Madison Avenue. John Hamm, incidentally, is again nominated for Best Actor. Hamm is also nominated for playing Tina Fey’s flaky boyfriend in several 30 Rock episodes.
——————-
When I first saw Kansas City’s own Edward Asner in a CSI: NY episode, playing a former Nazi, with chilling believability, it was obvious: He would be Emmy nominated as Best Guest Actor in a Drama Series. This has been a good year for Asner. He should also be nominated for an Oscar for his voice work in Up. And he should win for both.——————–
Rarely are there ties for Emmys. However, both Drew Barrymore and Jessica Lange, playing daughter and mother respectively, deserve like wins for their challenging work in the mini-series, Grey Gardens. Absolutely unforgettable performances.
——————–
Finally, a few words about two superb, Best Lead Actor, Miniseries or Movie, nominees: Brendan Gleeson and Kiefer Sutherland. This year, Sutherland missed the Best Actor in a Drama Series for his relentless Jack Bauer portrayal in 24, but he is nominated for his Bauer role in the mini-series that preceded this year’s 24 season, called 24: Redemption. However, Gleeson will win the Emmy due to his awesome acting as Winston Churchill in the mini-series Into the Storm.Isn’t speculation fun? Just get your own blog and have at it.
——————–
Emmy winners will be announced Sept. 20 on CBS.
Hmm time…
July 16, 2009
‘Half-Blood Prince’ is fun, satisfying Harry Potter installment
July 15, 2009
Evil forces are rampant at Hogwarts in Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince. So are hormones. In this installment, the sixth of eight based on the wildly popular Harry Potter books by J. K. Rowling, dark spirits boldly surface within and far away from the wizard school Hogwarts. yet with all the death and near death plot ingredients of Half-Blood Prince, Harry and his friends are diverted by matters of adolescence, aka dating, with all its pretentiousness, heartaches, flirts, and smooches. What a curiously effective mix for a Potter flick.
Effective it is. Half-Blood Prince is the best produced, and most entertaining Harry Potter escapade of the past three or four. I won’t say it is superior to the first two of the series, which are my favorites due to their fun atmosphere and lack of the grimness that followed, but Half-Blood is a near perfect delight. David Gates, who directed the last Potter (HP and the Order of the Phoenix) and will helm the next and final two (HP and the Deathly Hallows, Pts. 1 & 2), has obviously honed his skills here. Steve Kloves’ screenplay has verve and balance when it comes to the seesaw of light comedy and horror plot elements. He is also reputedly loyal to Rowling’s novel, as he was in the last three he adapted. Since I have not read the Potter novels, I rely on hearsay in this regard.
The acting is a showcase unto itself. Daniel Radcliffe’s Potter is more credible than ever, with Radcliffe stretching his acting chops beyond trademark looks of bewilderment. He has seriously worked to improve his acting over the years, and it shows. The same praise can be said for his two on-screen pals, Emma Watson (as Hermione Granger) and Ron Weasley (Rupert Grint). They have become the nucleus of a great stock company of Potter players. Those players also include an adult cast that, for the most part, have been with the Potter franchise since day one, among them: Michael Gambon (who has successfully replaced the late Richard Harris) as 150 years-old Professor Albus Dumbledore, more than ever a central figure in Half-Blood Prince; Maggie Smith’s Prof. Minverva McGonahall; Dave Legeno’s white-haired Fenrir Greyback; Robbie Coltrane’s comic relief Rubeus Hagrid; and Alan Rickman’s Prof. Severus Snape. There is also the evil witchery of Helena Bonham Carter’s Bellatrix Lestrange, and Ralph Fiennes’ son Hero Fiennes Tiffin as the nasty Tom Riddle at age 11.
Outside of Half-Blood’s focus on Dumbledore, scene stealing is accomplished by Jim Broadbent’s textured performance as returning wizard and Prof. Horace (Magic Potions) Slughorn.
The inherent weakness of any film series dependent on an episodic, continuing story line is that (1) the viewer must have seen–and can recall–the plots and characters from previous films over the last several years; and (2) not all conflicts will be resolved in this or any one episode, but might persist until the next film or films. That does not seem to matter to loyal Potter fans any more than it did to Star Wars fans who held their collective breaths for several years until the finale. Again, there are two more installments after Half-Blood Prince, supposedly in 2010 and 2011, so hold that oxygen.
That certainly said, and without divulging too much, Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince opens with Death Eaters raising havoc around and through Hogwarts. This is an very real omen of things to come via the ultimate confrontation between Potter and Dumbledore versus the Voldemort force(s) responsible for killing Harry’s parents. [A pause and reminder that it is assumed anyone reading this has seen the previous Potter movies.]
At the outset, Harry accompanies his mentor Dumbledore to the home of retired Potions Prof. Slughorn (Broadbent). It is an inspired sequence, Slughorn’s home has been ransacked by Death Eaters, and the affable Slughorn is hiding in unique disguise within. There are various other entanglements as well, some involving potion-spiked chocolates. All this mostly funny teen angst plays out through the story.
Still, there are some eerie, edge of the seat set pieces that thrill. A particularly effective sequence features Potter and Dumbledore on a quest within a water filled cavern. It is a stunner.
Quiddich, the airborne version of soccer essential to playtime competition between the various fraternal houses at Hogwarts, makes a fantastic return in Half-Blood Prince. Basically, a full game is played, the first time since episode two. (Yes, there was a brief Quiddich match in #4.) Except this time, due to the advanced age and size of its participants (Weasley), larger and more streamlined broomsticks are used.
Harry Potter and the Half-Blood Prince is one of eight parts of a film phenomenon of our time. Like the Star Wars series, the financial and social impact of the Potter series translates to motion picture history and, eventually, legend. Savor this satisfying episode of its ongoing broomstick ride.
——————————
GRADE on an A to F scale: A-
——————————
Enjoy the trailer: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=96QRVfto7OM
Remembering The Beatles in KC
July 13, 2009
Talk about schmoozing with celebrities! On September 17, 1964, The Beatles performed before an SRO crowd of typically screaming teens at the good old Kansas City Athletics Municipal Stadium in Kansas City, Mo. The KC stop was a sort of last minute, penciled-in concert during The Fab Four’s nationwide tour. We can thank the savvy Athletics owner Charles O. Finley for booking the boys. He reportedly did it as a favor to his teenaged daughter.
Even though not at the later concert, I and four fellow high school seniors did make it to the media madness occurring at the Muehlebach Hotel in downtown Kansas City, Mo. where the Mop Tops were staying. Prior to their performance, a press conference was held on the top floor on the hotel. Our school was the only Greater Kansas City high school in attendance. By no means were we invited, so we were planning to crash the event. As it turned out, we did not have to do so.
I took photos (see one above) of the craziness occurring on the sidewalk and in the park adjacent to the hotel. Hundreds of teenagers had gathered, and looked skyward to catch a John, Paul, George or Ringo glance. Jokesters in various hotel rooms were throwing fake autographs on slips of paper out their open windows just to get screaming reactions. The Beatles did briefly appear at the very top of the hotel on the penthouse balcony. They waved at the crowd dozens of stories below.
S
Sadly, the photo I took of them as they waved is not posted here. Since I had no telephoto lens, the images are ultra tiny. Still, it is a rare shot of the legendary quartet.
Sadly, the photo I took of them as they waved is not posted here. Since I had no telephoto lens, the images are ultra tiny. Still, it is a rare shot of the legendary quartet. The following story by my pal Karen Katz is reprinted from her story Beatled Press At Conference, published in the Wyandotte High School [Kansas City, Kansas] student newspaper, The Pantograph, on Oct. 2, 1964:
∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞
From the Panto were five staff members: Steve Crum, Janet Barnes, Joe Rodriguez, Sandy Shultz and myself, with high hopes and press passes. We were going to The Beatles Press Conference at the Hotel Muehlebach.
In the lobby of the hotel we approached the desk clerk to ask directions to the conference room. No one knew.
Going upstairs to scout around, we flashed our press passes at a policeman and started by. We were halted and informed that we needed orange stickers reading “Beatles Press.” These stickers could be obtained from Mr. Shauff, we were told, with a birth certificate saying, “18 years-old.” But all we had were press passes. If at first you don’t succeed, try again–and we did. Again and again and again–but Mr. Shauff was nowhere to be found.
We stood amidst a group of girls around a TV newsman. Suddenly Charles Finley appeared in the lobby. Joe [Rodriguez] walked over to him and began explaining our frantic situation. A crowd was gathering as Finley explained to us he didn’t arrange the conference. But we were persistent.“How many of you are there?” he asked.
“Five,” I answered.
“I can’t take all of you. I’ll take you.” He pointed to me.
Upstairs I started through a door at the end of the hall. I was stopped, and Mr. Finley spoke up.
“This girl is from the Wyandotte High School Pantograph, and I think she should be let in as a representative.”
“All right,” the man said, “but don’t scream or anything.”
The carpeted room was filled with newsmen, chairs, cameras and smoke. My hands were shaking, and the room was unusually stuffy.
The Beatles’ public relations man [Derek Taylor] entered and explained how the proceedings would be conducted. Then The Beatles shuffled in. It seemed as if I was staring at a magazine cover only this was the living end!
I moved to the front with the radio section of the conference and stood opposite The Beatles.
“Ringo,” I asked, “what are you going to do if it rains tonight and you get tonsillitis?”
He didn’t know, but for $150 thousand [what The Beatles were getting for this gig], what’s tonsillitis?
Then a cameraman offered to take my picture with them. In a dazed state, I walked up to Ringo and tugged on his coat sleeve. He put his arm around me! I smiled as cameras flashed and realized that I was a part of that living magazine cover!∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞∞
Postscript: Karen, wherever you are–since I have not seen you since 1965, please contact me asap with anything additional you recall about your up close Beatles experience. I recall when you returned from meeting the boys, you were dazed with glossy eyes and distant smile. Outside the hotel, on the sidewalk, you kept repeating that Ringo actually put his arm around you. Several teenaged girls, strangers to us, nearly ripped your blouse off when they overheard you. But we protected you.
And will forever envy you.
——————–
Enjoy this tribute to The Beatles performing in KC that memorable day in ’64: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FATj6dOc8Cg









